Security and trust in legal AI
Legal AI must fit confidential matter work. LexVera is structured around controlled access, careful use of matter information, visible sources and professional review.
This public page is a product and process overview, not a full security annex. Specific security terms, data-processing terms, retention periods and service commitments are set out in applicable customer documentation.
Security is broader than infrastructure
For law firms and legal teams, trust is not only about infrastructure. It is also about which matter information is used, which people have access, how source materials are displayed and who remains responsible for the legal result.
LexVera treats security as part of the legal workflow. An AI answer should not be separated from the sources, access rights and review expectations that apply within the firm.
Principles
Access control
Teams need to decide who works with which matters, documents and workflows.
Visible sources
Conclusions and factual statements should trace back to materials that can be checked.
Built-in review
AI supports the workflow. Client-facing use requires professional review.
Control points
Teams benefit from clear steps, responsibilities and rules for additional review.
Questions for assessment
A professional security or privacy assessment should ask concrete questions. Which personal data is processed? Which roles have access? How are tenant and matter boundaries implemented? Which vendors or subprocessors are involved? How are incidents reported? What rules apply to deletion, export and retention?
We prefer to answer those questions in the context of the intended use, firm type and workflows. For security or privacy questions, contact [email protected].